<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wavedash &#187; Rules of Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wavedash.net/tag/rules-of-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wavedash.net</link>
	<description>Grassroots Gaming, Online Communities and Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Universal Rule of Writing (That You Should Discard)</title>
		<link>http://www.wavedash.net/2008/05/the-universal-rule-of-writing-that-you-should-ignore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wavedash.net/2008/05/the-universal-rule-of-writing-that-you-should-ignore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wavedash.net/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Show, don&#8217;t tell.&#8221; At first pass, it&#8217;s the solution to 90% of bad writing. It&#8217;s such a vague, catch-all instruction that if you&#8217;re in a writer&#8217;s workshop, you can prove you critiqued your peers by writing &#8220;show, don&#8217;t tell!&#8221; all over their stories. Strident red letters work best. I prefer to replace the &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left;" src="http://www.wavedash.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/124659356_bbe1e5b661-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></p>
<p>&#8220;Show, don&#8217;t tell.&#8221;</p>
<p>At first pass, it&#8217;s the solution to 90% of bad writing. It&#8217;s such a vague, catch-all instruction that if you&#8217;re in a writer&#8217;s workshop, you can prove you critiqued your peers by writing &#8220;show, don&#8217;t tell!&#8221; all over their stories. Strident red letters work best. I prefer to replace the &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; with &#8220;not,&#8221; so I can refer to the phrase as <em>SnotT</em>. That acronym should tell you how highly I regard the overused criticism.</p>
<p>&#8220;Show, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; is shorthand for <em>Immerse your reader in the story through detail.</em> Turn your nouns, adjectives and verbs into people, emotions and actions. In Science Fiction, a particularly good piece of SnotT is called an <em>eye kick</em>, referring to vivid imagery that shocks the reader with just how futuristic the future is.</p>
<p>SnotT is absolutely necessary, and you should forget it exists.</p>
<p><span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>In fact, you should forget it for the exact reason it&#8217;s necessary. SnotT is a shortcut, just as telling your reader &#8220;Bob was mad&#8221; is a shortcut. Learning about SnotT sparks off a series of epiphanies about what writing (any kind of writing) is actually about. Anyone can say &#8220;Bob was mad.&#8221; It takes a writer to make Bob <em>act</em> mad.</p>
<p>But you already know this. If you&#8217;ve taken a writing course, you&#8217;ve probably been chastised for telling. You&#8217;ve also probably suffered the consequences of overcompensation, and written lines like &#8220;Bob tightly gripped the railing, his fingers turning whiter than north pole snow, unable to control the violent synaptic explosions sending ricochets of profanity bouncing off the walls of his medulla oblongata.&#8221; That&#8217;s a bad way of saying, &#8220;Bob was pissed.&#8221;</p>
<p>SnotT will instantly improve your writing, but runs into diminishing returns. Eventually, in order to improve, you have to crack the rule open and examine the gears turning inside. Many writing &#8220;rules&#8221; are, at the core, variations of &#8220;show, don&#8217;t tell.&#8221; Take a few from ye olde <em>Elements of Style:</em></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Avoid passive voice</strong> &#8211; &#8220;The ___ was ___ed by ___&#8221; is the tellingest way to tell something. &#8220;___ ___ed the ___&#8221; often forces you to come up with a better verb, or at least a description.</li>
<li><strong>Use definite, concrete language </strong>- Strunk compares &#8220;a period of unfavorable weather set in&#8221; with &#8220;it rained every day for a week.&#8221; The former is vague telling, the latter precise showing.</li>
<li><strong>Express coordinate ideas in similar form</strong> &#8211; &#8220;Blessed are the poor&#8230; Blessed are they that mourn&#8230; Blessed are the meek&#8230;&#8221; A cool example of showing <em>by</em> telling. Repetition and parallel construction clearly show the relationship between phrases.</li>
</ul>
<p>Most matters of style reduce to a variation of &#8220;show, don&#8217;t tell.&#8221; A good journalist has plenty of background beyond just the facts, a good copywriter will translate the product&#8217;s features into benefits, and a good fiction writer will avoid info dumps. It all comes back to SnotT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wavedash.net/2008/05/the-universal-rule-of-writing-that-you-should-ignore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

